Aligned to the standards institutions require.
Operational validation, functional separation and interoperability standards: the conditions under which regulated institutions can adopt a verification layer.
Six conditions, all non negotiable.
Evaluation in real environments
Operational validation with complex assets under institutional control standards.
Functional separation
Clear separation between verification, custody, financial operation and banking supervision.
ISO 20022 compatibility
Alignment with global institutional banking interoperability standards.
Event based verification
Continuous asset monitoring with auditable events and asset states.
Flexible integration
REST and service oriented APIs for institutional systems.
Institutional evaluation
Formal evaluation processes for controlled environments.
Institutions & actors
Continuous verification of real-world assets, audited end to end.
Every asset is cross-validated against 100+ verification modes, from satellite and SAR radar to IoT sensors and public registries. Every digital twin is independently audited by the Big 4 (Deloitte, PwC, EY, KPMG) in its first year after launch, reaches 99.9% replica accuracy across 9 twin layers, and carries a 6-stage data pedigree from source capture to DLT registration.
- 100+Verification modes
Optical, SAR radar, LiDAR, drones, IoT and registries, cross-validated per asset.
- 99.9%Replica accuracy
Fidelity of every digital twin to the physical asset it mirrors.
- 9Twin layers
Nine layers compose every digital twin, audited in its first year after launch.
- 6Data pedigree stages
From source capture to DLT registration, stage by stage.
Audited by the Big 4 in the first year after launch.
- Deloitte
- PwC
- EY
- KPMG
Every digital twin independently audited in its first year after launch.
Plus specialized firms per vertical. Mandatory by design.
Six stages, from source to ledger.
- 01Source capture
- 02Source authentication
- 03Ingestion & cleaning
- 04Cross-validation
- 05Twin integration
- 06DLT registration
One continuous score, from 0 to 100.
The Aura Verification Engine ingests and cross-validates 100+ sources to produce a continuous Trust Score.
- Hold<60
- Watch60-74
- Standard75-84
- Premium85-89
- Enterprise90-100
Remote sensing
- Optical satellite imageryWide-area imagery that tracks change over time.
- SAR radar, all-weather 24/7Sees through cloud, smoke and darkness.
- LiDAR 3D precision mappingPrecise 3D models of terrain and structures.
- Drone fleets (fixed-wing, multirotor, BVLOS)Close-range aerial surveys, flown on demand.
- Infrared & thermal camerasHeat signatures that reveal activity and faults.
On-site sensing
- Industrial IoT sensorsLive operating data, straight from the equipment.
- Environmental sensorsAir, water and soil conditions at the asset.
- Smart energy metersGeneration and consumption, metered in real time.
- H2 quality analyzersHydrogen purity, measured at the point of output.
- BIM & building sensorsBuilding models linked to live condition data.
- Regional field verification servicesLocal inspectors confirm evidence on the ground.
Registries, markets & standards
- Public registries & land recordsTitle and ownership, checked at the source.
- Regulatory bodiesPermits, licenses and official filings.
- Commodity & metals exchangesBenchmark prices and settlement records.
- Carbon & energy marketsCredit issuance, retirement and energy prices.
- Reference financial data providersPricing and reference data for valuation.
- International standards & certificationRecognized frameworks every check is held to.
Generated from verification, layer by layer.
- 01SPATIAL
- 02MATERIAL
- 03OPERATIONS
- 04VERIFIED
Evidence that survives a supervisor.
Continuous records, functional separation and reconstructable history are what let a regulated entity adopt a verification layer without inheriting a new counterparty risk.
Start a formal institutional evaluation.
Evaluation runs on real assets, under your control standards, with structured reporting under NDA.